<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Truth Is Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed</link>
	<description>Because if the truth is wrong then 'The Truth Is Wrong' is right!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:24:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s all about symmetry by Bud</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/argument-and-preaching/its-all-about-symmetry/comment-page-1/#comment-10985</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/?p=283#comment-10985</guid>
		<description>As mentioned, &#039;talking is cheap&#039;. Science is *not* a system of beliefs. Part of the scientific method includes &#039;making assumptions&#039;, which may me based on personal beliefs. However, those are not accepted as &#039;scientific truth&#039; until passing all the necessary verification steps.

Finding exceptions in things has nothing to do with the origin and/or the correctness of the method. Quite the opposite, it points out the ability to stick to actual findings when these are available. (You may want to have a look at http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/media/book/chapter-06a-in-science-we-trust/ ).

Religion is not measured in &#039;right&#039; and &#039;wrong&#039; because it does not have a method of dealing with factual claims. When it comes to &#039;values&#039; and &#039;beliefs&#039;, there is no right and wrong.

And finally, the fact that we don&#039;t know everything, does not make the things we know wrong. It is just a cause for keeping on researching. Science research would cease if we knew all. The fact that we cannot know all, in fact, is an interesting scientific argument by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned, &#8216;talking is cheap&#8217;. Science is *not* a system of beliefs. Part of the scientific method includes &#8216;making assumptions&#8217;, which may me based on personal beliefs. However, those are not accepted as &#8217;scientific truth&#8217; until passing all the necessary verification steps.</p>
<p>Finding exceptions in things has nothing to do with the origin and/or the correctness of the method. Quite the opposite, it points out the ability to stick to actual findings when these are available. (You may want to have a look at <a href="http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/media/book/chapter-06a-in-science-we-trust/" rel="nofollow">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/media/book/chapter-06a-in-science-we-trust/</a> ).</p>
<p>Religion is not measured in &#8216;right&#8217; and &#8216;wrong&#8217; because it does not have a method of dealing with factual claims. When it comes to &#8216;values&#8217; and &#8216;beliefs&#8217;, there is no right and wrong.</p>
<p>And finally, the fact that we don&#8217;t know everything, does not make the things we know wrong. It is just a cause for keeping on researching. Science research would cease if we knew all. The fact that we cannot know all, in fact, is an interesting scientific argument by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It&#8217;s all about symmetry by ArtII</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/argument-and-preaching/its-all-about-symmetry/comment-page-1/#comment-10984</link>
		<dc:creator>ArtII</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/?p=283#comment-10984</guid>
		<description>As it turns out, &#039;science&#039; evolved out of religion and is a subset of it.

Even science is a system of beliefs which is constantly evolving.

Take any scientific formula in existence and upon closer examination, you will find exceptions when you extend the scope of application.  Even F=ma loses it&#039;s meaning as you approach the speed of light.  Energy equals mass times the speed of light is coming under scrutiny in light of quantum mechanics.

Just because a system is useful doesn&#039;t mean it is absolutely right - or wrong.  Religion is quite right about things that science can not quantify ... yet.  In time, science .. or something like science as we know it today will succeed in quantifying ethics and morality into a more exact method as we come to understand ourselves better.  But have no fear, the vastness of the universal and all it&#039;s possibilities will never be exhausted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it turns out, &#8217;science&#8217; evolved out of religion and is a subset of it.</p>
<p>Even science is a system of beliefs which is constantly evolving.</p>
<p>Take any scientific formula in existence and upon closer examination, you will find exceptions when you extend the scope of application.  Even F=ma loses it&#8217;s meaning as you approach the speed of light.  Energy equals mass times the speed of light is coming under scrutiny in light of quantum mechanics.</p>
<p>Just because a system is useful doesn&#8217;t mean it is absolutely right &#8211; or wrong.  Religion is quite right about things that science can not quantify &#8230; yet.  In time, science .. or something like science as we know it today will succeed in quantifying ethics and morality into a more exact method as we come to understand ourselves better.  But have no fear, the vastness of the universal and all it&#8217;s possibilities will never be exhausted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the Mathematics of the Great Flood by Bud</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/comment-page-1/#comment-10983</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/#comment-10983</guid>
		<description>Thanks :) In practice there&#039;s more-or-less a fixed amount of water, and that includes the subterranean sources.

One creative Jewish excuse I heard of is of huge waves, each time covering OTHER mountain at any given time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks :) In practice there&#8217;s more-or-less a fixed amount of water, and that includes the subterranean sources.</p>
<p>One creative Jewish excuse I heard of is of huge waves, each time covering OTHER mountain at any given time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the Mathematics of the Great Flood by jjd1986</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/comment-page-1/#comment-10982</link>
		<dc:creator>jjd1986</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/#comment-10982</guid>
		<description>Hello. Old article. but interesting. I&#039;m reading Stephen Baxter&#039;s &quot;FLOOD&quot;. It&#039;s a great book. you should pick it up anyway.
But in the book he actually DOES use this subterrainian sea thing.
the &quot;springs of the great deep burst forth&quot;.

Thanks for the article. I professionally reserve the right to be undecided. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. Old article. but interesting. I&#8217;m reading Stephen Baxter&#8217;s &#8220;FLOOD&#8221;. It&#8217;s a great book. you should pick it up anyway.<br />
But in the book he actually DOES use this subterrainian sea thing.<br />
the &#8220;springs of the great deep burst forth&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article. I professionally reserve the right to be undecided. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 17b &#8211; I Think, Therefore You Are by Engrid</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/chapter-17b-i-think-therefore-you-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10437</link>
		<dc:creator>Engrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/?p=98#comment-10437</guid>
		<description>so maybe its time to move to bytes :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so maybe its time to move to bytes :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 17b &#8211; I Think, Therefore You Are by Bud</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/chapter-17b-i-think-therefore-you-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10436</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 04:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/?p=98#comment-10436</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s been completed long ago... I&#039;m just posting it bit by bit  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been completed long ago&#8230; I&#8217;m just posting it bit by bit  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Chapter 17b &#8211; I Think, Therefore You Are by Engrid</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/chapter-17b-i-think-therefore-you-are/comment-page-1/#comment-10435</link>
		<dc:creator>Engrid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/?p=98#comment-10435</guid>
		<description>Dear Writer ,
I dont know who you are but I like what you are writing and seen you haven&#039;t done it for long time... any chance to complete your book?

Engrid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Writer ,<br />
I dont know who you are but I like what you are writing and seen you haven&#8217;t done it for long time&#8230; any chance to complete your book?</p>
<p>Engrid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the Mathematics of the Great Flood by Bud</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/comment-page-1/#comment-10434</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/#comment-10434</guid>
		<description>Generally speaking I agree with you, with two remarks:

(1) It seems to be always possible to find excuses that explain whatever you want. If all else fails you can always come up with the &quot;miracle&quot; excuse.

(2) Not *every other* part of the bible is &quot;stolen&quot;. Like many ancient texts, some is and some isn&#039;t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally speaking I agree with you, with two remarks:</p>
<p>(1) It seems to be always possible to find excuses that explain whatever you want. If all else fails you can always come up with the &#8220;miracle&#8221; excuse.</p>
<p>(2) Not *every other* part of the bible is &#8220;stolen&#8221;. Like many ancient texts, some is and some isn&#8217;t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About the Mathematics of the Great Flood by Atheism_Is_Right</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/comment-page-1/#comment-10433</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheism_Is_Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 04:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/belief/logic/about-the-mathematics-of-the-great-flood/#comment-10433</guid>
		<description>There is absolutely zero proof that this story of a great flood ever happened, and MUCH evidence against it.

First of all the concept of a watery canopy is just ridiculous.  Having all that extra water in our atmosphere doesn&#039;t just sit there suspended.  It will add weight, increasing our atmospheric pressure.  The pressure would be so great that blood would actually boil.  So there goes that theory.

As to Noah being 600 years old, come on folks.  Are you that stupid?  

It is impossible to create a billion people in 5-6 generations starting from just 2 people.  unless pregnancy lasted less than a day.  And if that was true, why is it longer now? Why go through the trouble of changing our pregnancy terms?

If god was omniscient he would have foreseen the degeneration of the people he created in such a short time.  He would have known this would happen, thus how could he be sorrowful?  If he is omnibenevolent how is it benevolent to knowingly create a race that you know will degrade in such a short time?  I consider that malicious and evil.

All this is pretty damning proof there was no great flood ever, but the most damning piece of the puzzle is; why are there no written records of the various cultures during this time of the great flood?  Egypt would have been flooded but their society clearly survived, so how can you explain that?  They were not wiped out at all, and they were not on the ark.  so that proves what god said was wrong.  not everything died.  Also there is NO explanation of the America&#039;s, Australia, or any other continent with populated people on it.  All those people would have been wiped out.  They survived, and we found civilizations on each as they were discovered.  There are maps of this time from several areas that show the earth was the same as it is now, continents were not together.  

This tall tale, like every other part of the bible is stolen from previous myths that might loosely be based on some truth, but changed much over the thousands of years of time in between.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is absolutely zero proof that this story of a great flood ever happened, and MUCH evidence against it.</p>
<p>First of all the concept of a watery canopy is just ridiculous.  Having all that extra water in our atmosphere doesn&#8217;t just sit there suspended.  It will add weight, increasing our atmospheric pressure.  The pressure would be so great that blood would actually boil.  So there goes that theory.</p>
<p>As to Noah being 600 years old, come on folks.  Are you that stupid?  </p>
<p>It is impossible to create a billion people in 5-6 generations starting from just 2 people.  unless pregnancy lasted less than a day.  And if that was true, why is it longer now? Why go through the trouble of changing our pregnancy terms?</p>
<p>If god was omniscient he would have foreseen the degeneration of the people he created in such a short time.  He would have known this would happen, thus how could he be sorrowful?  If he is omnibenevolent how is it benevolent to knowingly create a race that you know will degrade in such a short time?  I consider that malicious and evil.</p>
<p>All this is pretty damning proof there was no great flood ever, but the most damning piece of the puzzle is; why are there no written records of the various cultures during this time of the great flood?  Egypt would have been flooded but their society clearly survived, so how can you explain that?  They were not wiped out at all, and they were not on the ark.  so that proves what god said was wrong.  not everything died.  Also there is NO explanation of the America&#8217;s, Australia, or any other continent with populated people on it.  All those people would have been wiped out.  They survived, and we found civilizations on each as they were discovered.  There are maps of this time from several areas that show the earth was the same as it is now, continents were not together.  </p>
<p>This tall tale, like every other part of the bible is stolen from previous myths that might loosely be based on some truth, but changed much over the thousands of years of time in between.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Religion a Virus Infecting Otherwise Healthy Minds? by Bud</title>
		<link>http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/media/book/is-religion-a-virus-infecting-otherwise-healthy-minds/comment-page-1/#comment-7364</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetruthiswrong.com/indeed/media/book/is-religion-a-virus-infecting-otherwise-healthy-minds/#comment-7364</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; Should we not eat pork now?

If you don&#039;t like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; Should we not eat pork now?</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

